IN YOUR CORNER Data reportMarket + website · August 2026
Evidence labeled Client portal Back to audit
Los Angeles County + stensonlaw.comEvidence snapshot

A huge market.
A small measured footprint.

Los Angeles has scale, linguistic complexity, and unequal injury exposure. Stenson's current website has real content and trust signals, but its conversion path, technical health, and traffic remain partly invisible.

Public9.69M

Los Angeles County residents

2025 population estimate
Public55.1%

language other than English at home

Age 5+ · ACS / QuickFacts
Supplied8,700

auto bodily-injury claims / month

Planning baseline, not claimant demand
Measured40 / 55

discovered URLs returning HTTP 200

15 discovered URLs returned 404
Decision

Build bilingual intake and target high-injury corridors, but let client language, signed matters, fees, and source data decide the actual market—not county population shares.

02 / Who lives there

Half the county is Latino.
More than half is multilingual.

This is the planning context for service design and intake. It is not a proxy for who gets hurt, hires a lawyer, or becomes a profitable client.

Detailed Census race-alone rowsOpen source definitions

These rows use Census race-alone definitions and may overlap with Hispanic origin. Keep them out of a mutually exclusive stacked chart.

Reported rowSharePeople, approximate
Asian alone16.4%1.59M
Black alone8.9%0.86M
Two or more races3.5%0.34M
American Indian / Alaska Native alone1.7%0.16M
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander alone0.4%39k
PeopleAge, sex, origin
Female50.5%
Under 1819.9%
Age 65+16.1%
Foreign-born33.4%
HouseholdsMoney, housing, travel
Median household income$90,112
Below poverty line13.3%
Homeowners45.9%
Drive alone64.8%
Mean commute30.4 min
Language at home · age 5+

Spanish matters to intake more than keyword language.

Many Spanish-speaking households search in English and still want a Spanish-speaking human when the call becomes personal.

03 / Demand + risk

Headcount is a prior.
Exposure changes the need.

The allocation below answers one narrow hypothetical: what would 8,700 monthly auto bodily-injury claims look like if injury risk were equal across groups? It is not observed claimant demand.

Naive prior

8,700 monthly auto BI claims

Planning math only. Do not use this as “who needs John.”

LatinoWhite NHAsianBlackRemainder
Public64.8%

of workers drive alone

Exposure follows miles and time in cars, not population alone.
Public20.4%

California uninsured-driver estimate

Statewide 2023 estimate; local ZIP-level rates vary.
Public6% → 70%

LA City High Injury Network

Share of city streets → pedestrian fatal/severe collisions.
Public15% / <6%

Black pedestrian deaths / population

California 2021; race was missing in many records.
Public≈73%

male pedestrian fatalities

California 2023; occupant-injury sex split was not available.
What unequal exposure changes

Target service and corridors.
Do not target identities.

  1. 01

    Auto dominates PI volume. Driving exposure, trip distance, road design, and insurance status matter more than raw county share.

  2. 02

    Pedestrian and bike harm is more concentrated. UCLA found Black people overrepresented across modes and disparities affecting Black and Latino pedestrians.

  3. 03

    Age changes case mix. Working-age adults carry lost-wage claims; children appear more in dog bites; older adults appear more in falls and pedestrian harm.

  4. 04

    Language is an intake requirement. Staff Spanish—and test other language lines—because people need to be understood, not because Spanish SEO should equal the Latino population share.

04 / Go to market

Aim by case, corridor,
and call path.

The county profile is the backdrop. The targeting map begins with how someone gets hurt, where they are, what they search, and whether the firm can serve them in the language they trust.

Operating rule

Do not turn census shares into media shares. Use English lawyer-intent, high-injury geography, bilingual intake, and Filevine outcomes to decide where the next dollar goes.

Largest reachable pool01

English-searching Latino households

Win the English search. Make the human handoff bilingual.

Capture
GBP + LSA, English money pages, Spanish human in under five minutes, bilingual SMS or WhatsApp follow-up.
Street
Chiros, body shops, churches, and other lawyers in East LA, SGV, and South Bay.
Do not build 40 thin abogado pages.
Trust path02

Spanish-dominant households

Serve the call, the family, and the paperwork—not a census percentage.

Capture
One excellent /es/ hub, car page, and contact page. “Hablamos español” on GBP, greeting, and retainer.
Street
Family referrals, churches, and selected Spanish radio only when intake can close the loop.
Measure preferred language in Filevine.
Case × place03

Pedestrian / High Injury Network

This is a harm-and-geography play, never a race-targeting play.

Capture
Pedestrian pages, GBP posts, and geo-radius search around South LA, East LA, DTLA, Pacoima, Long Beach, and Wilmington.
Street
Community organizations, churches, clinics, and local referral partners in the same corridors.
Target ZIP + case type. Never racial affinity.
Volume book04

Working-age drivers

Meet the crash where it happens: commute corridors, evenings, and weekends.

Capture
LSAs, lawyer-intent Google Ads, near-me pages, and a fast after-hours answer path.
Street
Body shops, tow operators, dealership service, motorcycle shops, and bike shops.
Most of the 8,700 BI planning baseline lives here.
Same audience, new script05

UM / hit-and-run

Build the California page and teach intake to explain: “We look at your own uninsured-motorist coverage.” Do not invent a new audience.

Choose one pocket06

Asian LA is not one market

Koreatown, SGV Chinese, Glendale Armenian, and Filipino communities need distinct phone-language and referral choices. Pick one only when the roster proves it.

Comparison shoppers07

Westside / mill shoppers

Use reviews and the local-vs-national comparison pages. Competition may be higher and case value may be better, but this is one lane—not the whole firm.

In Google
  1. 01

    Keywords English lawyer-intent first. Add Spanish exact-match only after signed-case data supports it.

  2. 02

    Geography Tight radii around High Injury Network corridors and the Flower St office—not all of LA County.

  3. 03

    Language Campaign language is not the person. Pair English keywords with a Spanish call path.

  4. 04

    LSAs Keep the profile bilingual and let location do the matching.

On the street
  1. 01

    One weekly corridor Every office on the route has a named Filevine source.

  2. 02

    Other lawyers Build relationships with firms that do not want smaller auto matters.

  3. 03

    Past clients Ask in the language they used with the firm: “If your cousin gets hit, call me.”

Do not

Four shortcuts that create bad strategy.

  • Split budget 49 / 25 / 16 / 9 to mirror the census.
  • Make Spanish SEO 49% of the plan.
  • Use race targeting for legal ads; use ZIP, case type, and language path.
  • Build Korean, Chinese, or Armenian sites before one language produces real cases.
Ask John in the room

What language is used across the current 40-case roster, and which ZIP codes do those clients live in?

That answer becomes the first real targeting map. Census remains context.
05 / Website anatomy

There is a real site.
It is carrying unfinished machinery.

The crawl found useful pages and substantial article copy. It also found broken URLs, indexable theme residue, conflicting identity facts, and weak on-page intake.

Direct crawl55

discovered URLs

This is crawl health, not Google index coverage. Search Console is required to know what Google actually indexed and served.

What the crawl found

Pages by job

Grouped from 55 crawl records.

Money + core20practice, home, about, contact, FAQ
Articles1514 posts + blog index
Junk + other1413 theme-junk records + campaign
Legal3privacy, disclaimer, terms
People / team3one six-word live page + two broken profiles
Conversion6 / 55

crawl rows contain a form; 49 contain none.

Most money pages force a call or another page.
Metadata23

rows have no meta description.

Metadata is not ranking magic, but missing descriptions waste control.
Phone identity39 / 23

rows show the 888 number / 310 number.

Many pages expose both, weakening trust and attribution.
Assets121 + 1

image rows + PDF row.

Seven asset rows have no alt/title value.
Practice depth1,024

median words across 12 live practice rows.

Length does not prove usefulness, originality, or conversion.
Attorney depth6

words on the live team/attorney row.

The named-attorney advantage is barely represented.
Current stack

WordPress + Elementor is doing too much.

Observed components include WP Engine, Cloudflare, Hello Elementor, Elementor Pro, Revolution Slider, Yoast, Contact Form 7, CookieYes, Site Kit, Trustindex, Instagram Feed, Jeg Elementor Kit, EWWW, and AccessPress.

  • 2019

    Theme-demo portfolio and slider residue remains.

  • 2023

    Footer copyright is frozen at “Stenson Law ® 2023.”

  • 2024

    Last blog modification in the sitemap: April 9.

  • 2025

    Last observed campaign modification: January 6.

06 / Performance

The current mobile page
makes visitors wait.

One repeatable Lighthouse observation on August 27, 2026. Lab scores vary by run; this is a dated diagnostic, not an uptime or field-user guarantee.

Performance28Needs rebuild
Accessibility89Good, not complete
Best practices35High technical risk
SEO92Checklist score, not rankings
First contentful paint6.6 s
Largest contentful paint11.4 s
Total blocking time2,580 ms
Speed index8.2 s
Layout shift0.016
What the browser carried
3,025 KiBTotal transfer
116Network requests

The rebuild target is not “a better score.” It is a materially faster path from landing to a trusted call, form, or human response.

Important

A 92 SEO score only means Lighthouse found many technical basics. It does not mean the firm ranks. One dated generic DTLA search did not show Stenson in the visible ads, local results, or first organic page.

07 / Traffic access

Traffic is knowable.
It is not publicly proved.

No defensible domain-specific visitor estimate surfaced from the public tools checked. Smaller sites are often below reliable third-party measurement. Use owned analytics for decisions.

Access required?

Monthly users and sessions

Google Analytics 4
Access required?

Organic clicks and impressions

Google Search Console
Access required?

Top queries and landing pages

Search Console + GA4
Access required?

Calls, forms, chats, signed cases

CallRail + Filevine
What public evidence can say

Visibility exists.
Volume remains unknown.

  1. 01

    Brand search resolves the firm. That proves entity discovery, not traffic volume.

  2. 02

    Google showed 4.9 stars and 35 reviews. The website widget showed 21 and Birdeye showed 162–170, so the surfaces disagree.

  3. 03

    One generic DTLA query did not show Stenson. That is a dated observation, not a rank tracker.

  4. 04

    Google Site Kit is installed. Analytics may already exist, but ownership, configuration, and usable history are unknown.

Connect in this order
01 · Search Console

Queries, pages, index coverage, geography, and click-through rate.

02 · GA4 + Tag Manager

Users, landing paths, calls/forms/chats, and conversion definitions.

03 · Call tracking + Filevine

Turn traffic into good leads, signed matters, fees, and source truth.

Sources and boundaries

Every number says what it is.

Public links plus private project crawl evidence.

The demographic percentages and 8,700-claim allocation are the supplied planning baseline. Public source vintages change; refresh them before external publication. Crawl counts come from the preserved August 27 site-doc exports. Traffic and conversion remain unknown until owned accounts are connected.